December 2025,Volume 47, No.4 
Internet

What’s in the web for family physicians − algorithmic addiction: an integrated analysis of mechanisms, multifaceted impacts, and mitigation

Sio-pan Chan 陳少斌,Wilbert WB Wong 王維斌,Alfred KY Tang 鄧權恩

Introduction

Algorithmic addiction constitutes a significant and evolving public health challenge in the 21st century. The formal recognition of Gaming Disorder in the DSM-5 marked an important milestone; however, this diagnostic framework remains inadequate for capturing the broader spectrum of compulsive behaviours shaped by algorithmic design, particularly those associated with social media platforms such as TikTok, Facebook, and YouTube.

Unlike gaming, compulsive engagement with social media has been normalised within everyday life, thereby obscuring its addictive potential. These platforms employ artificial intelligence to curate and perpetuate infinite streams of personalised content, activating dopaminergic pathways analogous to those implicated in substance use disorders. Although Gaming Disorder has been primarily associated with younger populations, algorithmic addiction transcends age boundaries. Older adults, often facing compounded risks due to social isolation and limited digital literacy, represent a demographic of increasing vulnerability.

This article analyses these algorithm-driven environments, drawing parallels to DSM-5 addiction models . It examines shared neurobehavioral mechanisms, significant health impacts across all age groups, and the urgent need for expanded diagnostic criteria and public health interventions to address this growing epidemic.

The converging mechanisms of gaming and algorithm-driven addiction

  1. Andrade, L. I., & Viñán-Ludeña, M. S. (2025). Mapping research on ICT addiction: A comprehensive review of Internet, smartphone, social media, and gaming addictions. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1578457

  2. De D, El Jamal M, Aydemir E, et al. Social Media Algorithms and Teen Addiction: Neurophysiological Impact and Ethical Considerations. Cureus. 2025 Jan 8;17(1):e77145.

  3. van Kolfschooten, H. (2025). Addictive Algorithms and the Digital Fairness Act: A New Chapter in EU Public Health Policy? Petrie-Flom Center, Harvard Law School. https://petrieflom.law.harvard.edu/2025/08/20/addictive-algorithmsand-the-digital-fairness-act-a-new-chapter-in-eupublic-health-policy

While gaming disorder and algorithmic addiction occur in different digital environments, both exploit the brain’s reward systems and behavioural design principles; algorithmic addiction, however, is amplified by AI-driven, highly personalised, and seamlessly delivered rewards, which complicates detection, selfregulation, and policy-level regulation.

1. Shared neurobiological pathways

Both gaming and algorithm-driven social media platforms exert their addictive potential by exploiting the brain’s mesolimbic dopamine pathway, the core circuit responsible for reward and reinforcement. The anticipation and receipt of rewards, whether levelling up in a game or receiving social validation via likes and notifications, triggers dopamine release, creating a powerful reinforcement loop.

Over time, this leads to neuroadaptations, including reduced dopamine receptor sensitivity. This diminishes the pleasure from natural rewards and increases dependence on digital stimulation to feel good, a hallmark of addiction. This shared neurobiology explains the high comorbidity between different types of digital addiction and their similarity to substance use disorders.

2. Engineered compulsion: design principles

The addictive potential of both domains is not accidental, but a product of deliberate design grounded in behavioural psychology. Key principles include:

  • Variable Reward Schedules: The unpredictable nature of rewards (a rare ingame item, a viral post) is highly effective at sus taining compul s ive behaviour, creating a loop of desire and seeking.

  • Endless Engagement Loops: Features like infinite scroll on social media or persistent game worlds eliminate natural stopping points and encourage extended use.

  • Social Obligation and FOMO: Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Games (MMORPGs) create social pressure to remain active for one's guild, while social media feeds a Fear of Missing Out (FOMO) on events and interactions.

The primary distinction is the enabling technology. Game design often uses structured reward systems, while social media employs sophisticated artificial intelligence to personalise an endless, uniquely compelling stream of content . This AI-driven personalisation is increasingly recognised as a public health concern, leading to regulatory initiatives like the proposed EU Digital Fairness Act which aims to address “addictive algorithms” and “dark patterns”

The multifaceted health impacts of digital addiction

  1. Pedersen, J., et al. Effects of limiting recreational screen media use on physical activity and sleep in families with children: A cluster randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatrics, 2022;176(6), 578–586.

  2. Small, G. W., et al. Brain health consequences of digital technology use. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 2020;22(2), 105–111.

  3. Hunt, M. G., et al. No more FOMO: Limiting social media decreases loneliness and depression. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 2018;37(10), 751–768.

  4. Pieh, C., et al. Smartphone screen time reduction improves mental health: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Medicine, 2025;23, 107.

  5. Bonsaksen, T., et al. Associations between social media use and loneliness in a cross-national population: Do motives for social media use matter? Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, 2023;11(1), 2158089.

  6. Paterna, A., et al. Problematic smartphone use and academic achievement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Behavioural Addictions, 2024;13(2),313326.

Algorithmic addiction profoundly impairs physical, psychological, cognitive, social, and developmental domains, generating substantial individual and systemic healthcare burdens. High-quality evidence from these randomised controlled trials (RCTs), meta-analyses, and neuroimaging studies underscores these effects and their partial reversibility through targeted interventions such as screen time limits.

1. Physical health impacts

Excessive recreational screen media use promotes sedentary behaviour and induces neurological alterations, heightening risks for obesity, musculoskeletal disorders, and impaired executive function. In a cluster randomised clinical trial involving 89 families (181 children aged 6-10 years), limiting recreational screen use to ≤ 3 hours per week for 2 weeks — achieved by surrendering portable devices — increased children’s daily leisure non-sedentary physical activity by 46 minutes (95% CI: 28-64 minutes; P < .001) and moderate-to-vigorous activity, particularly on weekends, with 97% child compliance; no significant sleep improvements were observed via EEG. Neuroimaging evidence further reveals that heavy digital technology engagement correlates with reduced prefrontal gray matter, diminished white matter integrity in language pathways, and disrupted default mode network function, akin to addictionrelated changes, while excessive screen time (> 3 hours daily in children) displaces physical activity and exacerbates sleep disruption via blue light exposure.

2. Psychological and cognitive impacts

Prolonged social media and smartphone use trigger dopamine-driven reinforcement, social comparison, and attentional fragmentation, exacerbating depression, anxiety, and fear of missing out in a dose-dependent manner; randomised interventions demonstrate swift reversibility. Among 143 undergraduates, restricting Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat to 10 minutes per platform daily (~30 minutes total) for 3 weeks significantly lowered loneliness (F (1,111) = 6.90, P = .01) and depression — particularly for those with high baseline scores (Beck Depression Inventory scores decreased from 23 to 14.5) — relative to unlimited use. Similarly, in 111 young adults capping smartphone screen time at ≤2 hours daily for 3 weeks yielded 27% reductions in depressive symptoms, 14% gains in well-being, 16% drops in stress, and 18% improvements in sleep quality (time × group η² = 0.05-0.11; P ≤ .05), with stronger effects among strict adherents.

3. Social and developmental impacts

Algorithmic addiction undermines interpersonal skills and real-world performance by substituting superficial virtual interactions for meaningful face-to-face engagement, fostering isolation and academic underachievement. A crossnational survey of 1,649 adults across four countries found daily social media use positively associated with loneliness (β = 0.12, P < .001), with stronger effects (β = 0.14, P < .01) among those motivated by relationship maintenance rather than escapism, indicating virtual platforms inadequately fulfil social needs. Complementing this, a meta-analysis of 29 studies (n = 48,490) confirmed problematic smartphone use impairs academic achievement (r = -0.11, 95% CI: -0.16 to -0.07, P < .001; I² = 94%), with moderate effects (r = -0.21) in elementary/middle schoolers versus smaller ones in college students, underscoring developmental vulnerability.

Mitigating strategies

  1. Kuss, D. J., Griffiths, M. D., & Binder, J. Internet addiction in adolescents: Prevalence, diagnostic criteria, and management. Current Psychiatry Reports, 2019;21(8), 49.

  2. Young, K. S. Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 1998;1(3), 237-244.

  3. Young, K. S. Cognitive behavior therapy with internet addicts: Treatment outcomes and implications. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2007;10(5), 673-677.

  4. Young, K. S., & de Abreu, C. N. (2011). Internet addiction: A handbook and guide to evaluation and treatment. John Wiley & Sons.

Algorithmic addiction is a challenge that requires collaboration between healthcare professionals and society. Clinicians can use tools like the Internet Addiction Test (IAT) and provide Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) to affected individuals. At the same time, societal efforts - such as education, legislation, and community programs - are essential to prevent its development. By working together, we can ensure that technology remains a helpful tool rather than a source of harm, protecting the mental health and well-being of future generations.

Identification and assessment

Early detection is crucial for effective intervention. The Internet Addiction Test (IAT), developed by Kimberly Young, is a widely used screening tool. It assesses problematic internet use, neglect of social responsibilities, and emotional distress related to excessive internet engagement. The score helps clinicians determine the severity of the problem, especially among adolescents and young adults who are most vulnerable. Clinical interviews also help explore underlying motivations and identify concurrent mental health conditions such as depression or anxiety.

Treatment with cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)

Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) is effective for behavioural addictions, including algorithmic addiction. It aims to identify and change negative thoughts and behaviours that lead to compulsive internet use. Research shows that CBT can significantly reduce internet use and improve psychological well-being. Family support often enhances outcomes. During CBT, clinicians can identify individual triggers and set realistic goals for reducing digital engagement. Teaching skills like time management, mindfulness, and stress regulation helps patients develop healthier routines. Regular monitoring with tools like the IAT ensures progress, and peer support groups can provide ongoing motivation.

Education and awareness

Prevention begins with education. Schools can include responsible digital use in their curriculum and teach early recognition of problematic behaviours. Parents should be equipped with strategies to set limits, monitor usage, and encourage offline activities.

Laws and policies

Rules, especially for children, are vital. Governments can enforce age restrictions on online gaming and social media, requiring features such as time limits and usage reminders. Content moderation and advertising restrictions can also reduce exposure to potentially addictive environments.

Community involvement

Community programs can promote healthy digital habits. Schools should encourage sports, social skills, and digital literacy together. Employers can contribute by fostering a healthy work-life balance and discouraging after-hours digital engagement, which can lead to overuse. Additionally, standardised diagnostic criteria and clear guidelines for diagnosis and treatment would help professionals identify and manage algorithmic addiction consistently.


Sio-pan Chan, MBBS (HK), DFM (HKCU), FHKFP, FHKAM (Family Medicine)
Family Physician in private practice
Wilbert WB Wong, FRACGP, FHKCFP, Dip Ger MedRCPS (Glasg), PgDipPD (Cardiff)
Family Physician in private practice
Alfred KY Tang, MBBS (HK), MFM (Monash)
Family Physician in private practice

Correspondence to: Dr. Sio-pan Chan, SureCare Medical Centre (CWB), Room 1116-7,
11/F, East Point Centre, 555 Hennessy Road, Causeway Bay,
Hong Kong SAR.
E-mail: siopanc@gmail.com