Summary
				   Duplicated or double uterus associated with double            cervices and double vaginae and orifices is a very rare anomaly. We            report a case of an adult female with incidental finding of double vaginal            openings, double cervices and a septate uterus. The pathophysiology            and associated complications of this rare condition was discussed. Doctors            are reminded to stay vigilant and to pay careful attention to details            even when doing the most routine and unsuspecting task.
				  摘要
				  雙子宮兼雙子宮頸和雙陰道是非常罕見的缺陷。本文記述一位意外被發現同時擁有雙陰道口、雙子宮頸和子宮間隔的成年女姓病例,討論有關病理生理和併發症。醫生即使在處理最常規和無可疑的工作時,都應當注意細節並且保持警覺性。
Introduction
Maldevelopment of the female reproductive ducts occur          in up to 2% to 3% of women.1 The clinical picture can range          from completely asymptomatic to presentation with acute and severe symptoms.          This paper describes a rare case of double uteri, double cervices and          double vaginae picked up in adulthood, after numerous previous gynaecological          examinations of apparently normal findings, and the implications to the          patient and doctors at large.
Case report
The patient is a 28-year-old woman with good past health.          After menarche at the age of 13, she had regular monthly menstruation          with normal flow. There was no menstrual pain. She has been sexually active          and there was no sexual dysfunction. She had regular gynaecological examinations          and cervical smears done by various gynaecologists since 1999 and was          told to have no abnormality. In 2001, after a routine gynaecological exam          she was told that she had slightly enlarged ovaries. She was referred          for abdominal ultrasonography, which reported normal findings. Patient          sought a second opinion from another gynaecologist later with gynaecological          examination and ultrasonography repeated. She was told that she had polycystic          ovaries and a bicornuate uterus. In 2003, she took out a routine body-check          programme in a private hospital, which included gynaecological examination          and cervical smear, and was told that the results were normal. She had          another gynaecological examination a year later, which again was said          to be normal. In 2005 she again booked for a routine gynaecological check-up.          This time the examining doctor told her that two cervices were found.          She presented to our clinic for a second opinion and advice on subsequent          actions needed.
Physical examination revealed a generally healthy female.          On inspection of the vulva and perineum there were two vaginal openings          lying parallel to each other. Digital examinations revealed two vaginae          separated by a thick septum, and two cervices were felt. Speculum examinations          revealed two normal looking cervices. The uterus was anteverted, normal          sized and smooth in contour. No pelvic mass was felt and no tenderness          was elicited. The physical findings were explained to the patient. Ultrasonography          was arranged in order to assess the structure of the uterus and to rule          out other associated malformations in the urogenital tract.
Abdominal and transvaginal ultrasonography was performed          which showed a completely septate uterus with no definite fundal cleft.          The ovaries were unremarkable. The kidneys were normal.
During consultation the patient revealed a desire to          get pregnant and that she had tried unprotected sex for several years          without any conception. In view of the structural abnormality of her reproductive          tract, which may adversely affect her fertility, she was referred to a          gynaecologist for expert opinion. Hysteroscopy was performed, which revealed          a double uterus and vagina and double cervices. She was given clomid for          ovulation induction for her infertility.
Literature review
Under the influence of maternal oestrogens, the mullerian          or paramesonephric ducts of the genetically female embryo form the fallopian          tubes and subsequently fuse together on the median septum to create the          uterus, cervix and the upper part of the vagina. The lower part of the          vagina is formed by a protrusion of the urogenital sinus, the vaginal          sinus, which develops progressively to form the vaginal fornices. This          process begins from the tenth to 17th week of pregnancy and          is completed just prior to term1. In case of non-development          or non-fusion (partial or complete) of the mullerian ducts, a variety          of anomalies can result, ranging from complete agenesis to doubling of          the female reproductive organs. These anomalies have been classified into:          agenesis/hypoplasia, unicornuate uterus, didelphic uterus, bicornuate          uterus, septate or arcuate uterus.2 (Figure          1) Double cervices and vaginae with a septate uterus is an uncommon          mullerian malformation. An advanced Medline search showed that this is          an uncommonly reported anomaly.3 Mullerian duct anomalies may          be accompanied by anomalies in other systems in the body, particularly          in the urinary tract, such as renal agenesis and a double collecting systems          (renal basin and ureters). Muscular and skeletal system, collagen-vascular          diseases, digestive tract (chiefly imperforate anus), cardiac anomalies          and anomalies of the eyes and ears are other rarer associations. The direct          cause of the congenital anomalies of the female genital tract is not known,          but it is believed that multifactorial, polygenic, and familial factors          could play a part. Some of these factors include the exposure of the pregnant          woman to doses of ionizing radiation, intrauterine infections, and drugs          such as thalidomide and diethylstilbestrol.4
Women with congenital anomalies of the genital tract          may be asymptomatic, but generally they can suffer a wide range of symptoms,          which can manifest themselves at any of the various stages of life, from          childhood to senescence; before pregnancy, during pregnancy, and after.          Primary amenorrhoea and chronic pelvic pain are common. Longitudinal vaginal          septa can be found alone or in combination with other anomalies, chiefly          uterus didelphys, in up to 57% of cases. In such cases, pain during sexual          intercourse is common.
Approximately 25% of women with mullerian anomalies          have fertility and obstetric problems as compared with 10% of the normal          healthy population5. There is generally no problem in conceiving          but rather in maintaining a normal pregnancy to its completion. Still,          the incidence of unexplained infertility among these cases could be as          high as 35%. Spontaneous abortion in the first and second trimester of          pregnancy, abnormal foetal presentation, premature birth, dystocia, pathologic          conclusions of pregnancy, stillbirth, and ectopic pregnancy are among          the many problems that appeared during pregnancy and labour. There is          the possibility of simultaneous pregnancy in both uteri or in one uterus          even after the excision of the other one for whatever medical reason.
The means of diagnosis encompass a wide variety of possibilities,          including simple vaginal palpation, hysterosalpingography (HSG), laparoscopy,          hysteroscopy, and ultrasound.1 Recent studies also show that          MRI is a valuable tool in diagnosing mullerian duct anomaly subtypes,          so as to spare patients mutilating surgery and to prevent pregnancy-associated          complications.6
The therapeutic approach in mullerian duct anomalies          is specific to the type of anomaly, and includes non-treatment, medical          therapy, and surgical treatment. It is important to carry out comprehensive          examinations and to be certain that the fertility and obstetric problems          stem purely from uterine causes before taking surgical steps to correct          those problems.
Discussion
Congenital anomaly of the female genital tract is rare.          Indeed, from the Medline search that we conducted, there were less than          a handful of cases reported in the medical literature. Therefore, it is          worth reporting when we come across one such case. Moreover, our case          serves as a reminder to all doctors of the importance of a basic physical          examination skill - careful inspection. Gynaecological examination is          part and partial of most doctors' everyday work. As with all other clinical          examinations, a careful and focused approach is needed when we examine          the female genital tract. Our case is a good illustration of how a simple          but careful inspection of the female genital tract could lead to discovery          of a rare anomaly, which was missed repeatedly even by experienced gynaecologists.          Although congenital duct anomalies are rare, the failure to recognize          one can have potential consequences. Take this case for example. Since          the patient has two cervices and she is sexually active, if we fail to          notice the anomaly and just perform cervical smear on one cervix only,          which was what happened in the past few years, we could miss early pathological          changes in the other cervix. And the patient might be falsely reassured.          The patient might return years later with some really serious pathology,          such as carcinoma of the cervix. Subfertility is a problem faced by many          such patients, an early diagnosis of the congenital anomaly can alert          the doctor and patient to this associated possibility and to take action          accordingly.
Conclusion
We describe a patient with the rare condition of uterus          didelphys, double cervices and double vaginae and review the knowledge          we have thus far of this condition. Our case report highlights the importance          of careful physical examination in the clinician's everyday practice:          not just with patients presenting with symptoms, but also with patients          who come in for a "mere routine check".
Key messages
- Uterus didelphys is a rare congenital mullerian duct anomaly in              females.
 
- Uterus didelphys is associated with fertility and obstetric problems,              and anomalies in other systems of the body.
 
- Doctors are reminded that careful inspection is a basic but important              examination skill.
 
Man-kuen Cheung, MBBS            (HK), FHKCFP, FRACGP
 Medical Officer, 
  Augustine Lam, MBBS (HK), FRACGP, FHKCFP,            FHKAM (Family Medicine)
 Consultant in Family Medicine,
  Philip K T Li, MD (CUHK), FRCP (Lond), FRCP            (Edin), FACP
 Director of Family Medicine, 
 Family Medicine Training Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital.
Correspondence to: 
  Dr Man-kuen Cheung, Family Medicine Training Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, N.T.,  Hong Kong.
 
References
- Golan A, Langer R, Bukovsky I, et al. Congenital              anomalies of the mullerian system. Feril Steril 1989;51:747-755.
 
- American Fertility Society. The American Fertility              Society Classification of the adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion              secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Mullerian anomalies              and intrauterine adhesions.  Fertil Steril 1988;49:944-955.
 
- Hundley AF, Fielding JR, Hoyte L, et al.              Double cervix and vagina with septate uterus: An uncommon Mullerian              malformation. Obst & Gynae 2001; 98:982-985.
 
- Toaff ME, Lev-Toaff AS, Toaff R, et al. Communicating              uteri: Review and classification with introduction of two previously              unreported cases. Fertil Steril 1984;41:661-679.
 
- Heinonen PK, Pystynen PP, et al. Primary              infertility and uterine anomalies. Fertil Steril 1983;40:311-316.
 
- Carrington BM, Hricak H, Nuruddin RN, et al.              Mullerian duct anomalies: MR imaging evaluation. Radiology 1990;176:715-720.